Melina Kibbe

Publishing in medical journals doesn’t have to be mysterious or reserved for an elite few. Many healthcare professionals hesitate due to myths—believing they need perfect data, massive studies, or inside connections. This article dismantles these barriers, showing that transparency, sound methodology, and relevance matter more than perfection. Small-scale studies, case reports, and even negative results contribute to science by closing gaps and guiding future research. You’ll gain clarity on the peer review process, learn how ethical standards protect credibility, and discover how to choose the right journal based on audience and scope rather than chasing only high impact factors. Rejection? It’s not the end—just an opportunity to refine and resubmit. With persistence, constructive use of feedback, and a focus on ethical, well-structured work, you can successfully navigate medical publishing. Whether new to research or looking to expand your portfolio, these insights will empower you t...

For many healthcare professionals and researchers, submitting a manuscript to a medical journal is exciting and daunting. Unfortunately, countless submissions are delayed or rejected because of simple, preventable errors. One of the most frequent missteps is failing to follow a journal’s specific guidelines—overlooking formatting, word count, or reference requirements sends a signal of carelessness. Another standard error is targeting the wrong journal; choosing based on prestige rather than subject fit often results in quick rejection and lost time. The title and abstract are equally critical, serving as the manuscript’s first impression. A vague or overly complex title and an unclear abstract can weaken the reviewer’s understanding of your study’s relevance. Poor structure, insufficient methodological details, and weak ethical transparency—such as not mentioning IRB approval or informed consent—further jeopardize acceptance. Reviewers must be able to trust your work's rigor and ...

The role of the surgeon-scientist has undergone significant evolution in recent years. These professionals are no longer confined to the operating room; they are expected to drive medical innovation by conducting research that directly influences surgical procedures. By merging clinical practice with research, surgeon-scientists bridge the gap between theory and practice, ensuring that their discoveries are immediately applicable to patient care. Their work is crucial for advancing treatments, enhancing surgical techniques, and discovering new methods to manage and prevent diseases. Through their dedication to both science and surgery, they are helping to shape the future of healthcare. By exploring new areas of research, surgeon-scientists push the boundaries of what is possible in medicine. Learn more .